mardi 29 octobre 2013

الحشرات الأحفوريّة

أستاذ العلوم البريّة والاحفوريّة Matthew Clapham بجامعة كاليفورنيا في Santa Cruz, والطالب Jered Karr: قاما بمُراكمة مجموعة من التفاصيل والمعطيات المتصلة بطول أجنحةالحشرات الأحفوريّة, قاموا بتحليل حجم الحشرات وصلته بمستويات الاوكسجين بالغلاف الجوي, خلال مئات ملايين الاعوام من تطور الحشرات.يؤكّد Clapham على:" حجم حشرات ما قبل التأريخ مرتبط بكميّة الاوكسجين الموجودة بالحقبة التي تقدّر بحوالي 200 مليون عام ". ويُضيف:" حيث ازداد الاوكسجين ولكن حجم الحشرة قل

طائر القرزبيل

يستخدم منقاره القوي والمتقاطع لفتح ثمار الصنوبر


النسر_الملك....

هذا الطائر يستغل تيارات الهواء أثناء الطيران في حمله كي تساعده على الطيران وتوفير طاقته خلال بحثه عن الطعام في الغابات أو الصحاري. ..

Today In History. What Happened This Day In History

1618Sir Walter Raleigh is executed. After the death of Queen Elizabeth, Raleigh's enemies spread rumors that he was opposed the accession of King James.
1787Mozart's opera Don Giovanni opens in Prague.
1814The Demologos, the first steam-powered warship, launched in New York City.
1901Leon Czolgosz is electrocuted for the assassination of US President William McKinley. Czolgosz, an anarchist, shot McKinley on September 6 during a public reception at the Temple of Music in Buffalo, N.Y. Despite early hopes of recovery, McKinley died September 14, in Buffalo, NY.
1927Russian archaeologist Peter Kozloff apparently uncovers the tomb of Genghis Khan in the Gobi Desert, a claim still in dispute.
1929Black Tuesday–the most catastrophic day in stock market history, the herald of the Great Depression. 16 million shares were sold at declining prices. By mid-November $30 billion of the $80 billion worth of stocks listed in September will have been wiped out.
1945The first ball-point pen goes is sold by Gimbell's department store in New York for a price of $12.
1949Alonzo G. Moron of the Virgin Islands becomes the first African-American president of Hampton Institute, Hampton, Virginia.
1952French forces launch Operation Lorraine against Viet Minh supply bases in Indochina.
1964Thieves steal a jewel collection–including the world's largest sapphire, the 565-carat "Star of India," and the 100-carat DeLong ruby–from the Museum of Natural History in New York. The thieves were caught and most of the jewels recovered.
1969The U.S. Supreme Court orders immediate desegregation, superseding the previous "with all deliberate speed" ruling.
1969First computer-to-computer link; the link is accomplished through ARPANET, forerunner of the Internet.
1972Palestinian guerrillas kill an airport employee and hijack a plane, carrying 27 passengers, to Cuba. They force West Germany to release 3 terrorists who were involved in the Munich Massacre.
1983More than 500,000 people protest in The Hague, The Netherlands, against cruise missiles.
1986The last stretch of Britain's M25 motorway opens.
1998South Africa's Truth and Reconciliation Commission reports condemns both sides on the Apartheid issue for committing atrocities.
1998John Glenn, at age 77, becomes the oldest person to go into outer space. He is part of the crew of Space Shuttle Discovery, STS-95.
1998The deadliest Atlantic hurricane on record up to that time, Hurricane Mitch, makes landfall in Honduras (in 2005 Hurricane Wilma surpassed it); nearly 11,000 people died and approximately the same number were missing.
2004For the first time, Osama bin Laden admits direct responsibility for the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks in the US; his comments are part of a video broadcast by the Al Jazeera network.
2008Delta and Northwest airlines merge, forming the world's largest airline.
2012Hurricane Sandy devastates much of the East Coast of the US; nearly 300 die directly or indirectly from the storm.
Born on October 29
1882Jean Giraudoux, French dramatist, novelist and diplomat, famous for his book Tiger at the Gates.
1891Fanny Brice, comedian, singer and actress.
1897Joseph G. Göbbels, German Nazi Propaganda Minister who committed suicide in Hitler's bunker.
1905Henry Green, novelist (LivingParty Going).
1910A. J. Ayer, English philosopher.
1921Bill Maudlin, American cartoonist whose GI characters "Willie" and "Joe" appeared in Stars and Stripes newspapers during World War II.
1938Ralph Bakshi, Palestinian-American director of live films and animated full-length films for adults including 1972's Fritz the Cat (first animated film to be rated X by the Motion Picture Association of America), Wizards (1977) and The Lord of the Rings (1978).
1943Don Simpson, film producer, screenwriter, actor; (co-producer Flashdance, 1985; Top Gun, 1986).
1945Melba Moore, disco and R&B singer, actress ("You Stepped into My Life," "Lean on Me").
1946Peter Green, guitarist, songwriter, founder of the band Fleetwood Mac; regarded as one of the greatest guitarists of all time.
1947Richard Dreyfuss, actor (American GraffitiJaws; won Academy Award for Best Actor for 1977's The Goodbye Girl).
1948Kate Jackson, actress, director, producer (original Charlie's Angels TV series, Scarecrow and Mrs. King TV series).
1954Lee Child, author; creator of the Jack Reacher novel series.
1958David Remnick, journals, author, magazine editor (The New Yorker); won Pulitzer Prize forLenin's Tomb: The Last Days of the Soviet Empire (1994).
1971Winona Ryder, actress, producer (BeetlejuiceGirl, Interrupted).

Beach Cave, Algarve, Portugal


lundi 28 octobre 2013

my friend


"These images captured by nature photographer Lassi Rautiainen, show an unusual friendship between a lone wolf and a bear. The images show how the young brown bear and grey wolf would sit down to eat together and even enjoy views over the landscape for up to two-hours.

It’s never clear why these unusual pairings occur, but wild animals that get separated from their mothers too early, or that are cast out from the group (like this wolf, perhaps), sometimes take odd steps as they figure out how to survive on their own. A partner of any species might simply bring comfort, a sense of safety."

Rautiainen adds: "When I realised that no one had observed bears and wolves living near each other and becoming friends in Europe, I concentrated more and more on getting pictures to show what can happen in nature."

Holy cow! Dino flatulence may have changed ancient climate


Nev­er mind cows: di­no­saurs pass­ing gas could have re­leased enough cli­mate-altering meth­ane gas to warm the pre­hist­or­ic world, ac­cord­ing to newly pub­lished cal­cula­t­ions.

While many a stu­dent has snick­ered over the ob­serva­t­ion that flat­u­lat­ing live­stock con­trib­ute to the at­mos­pher­ic green­house gas­es blamed for glob­al warm­ing to­day, deal­ing with a hulk­ing ap­at­o­saur­us (a.k.a. bron­to­sau­rus) with in­di­ges­tion might have been no laugh­ing mat­ter.

The new re­search pub­lished in the May 8 is­sue of the re­search jour­nal Cur­rent Bi­ol­o­gy al­so sug­gests that this beast and its kin—giant dino­saurs known as sau­ro­pods—could have har­bored enough meth­ane-making mi­crobes in their guts to make a sub­stan­ti­al cli­mate im­pact.

“A sim­ple math­e­mat­i­cal mod­el sug­gests that the mi­crobes liv­ing in sau­ro­pod di­no­saurs may have pro­duced enough meth­ane to have an im­por­tant ef­fec­t,” said Dave Wilkin­son of Liv­er­pool John Moores Uni­vers­ity in the U.K. “Our cal­cula­t­ions sug­gest that these di­no­saurs could have pro­duced more meth­ane than all mod­ern sources—both nat­u­ral and man-made—put to­geth­er.”

Meth­ane and oth­er green­house gas­es tend to warm the cli­mate by trap­ping heat in the at­mos­phere, sci­en­tists say.

Dis­tinc­tive for their enor­mous size and long necks, sau­ro­pods were wide­spread about 150 mil­lion years ago. As in cows, meth­ane-producing mi­crobes aided the sau­ro­pods’ di­ges­tion by fer­ment­ing their plant food. Wilkin­son and study co­au­thor Graeme Rux­ton from the Uni­vers­ity of St An­drews, U.K. were stu­dying sau­ro­pod ecol­o­gy when a ques­tion dawned on them: If mod­ern cows pro­duce enough meth­ane gas to be of in­ter­est to cli­mate sci­en­tists, what about sau­ro­pods? They teamed up with meth­ane ex­pert Euan Nis­bet at the Uni­vers­ity of Lon­don to work out the num­bers.

“Clearly, try­ing to es­ti­mate this for an­i­mals that are un­like an­y­thing liv­ing has to be a bit of an ed­u­cat­ed guess,” Wilkin­son said.

Phys­i­ol­o­gists have stud­ied meth­ane pro­duc­tion from a range of mod­ern an­i­mals to de­rive equa­t­ions that pre­dict meth­ane pro­duc­tion from an­i­mals of dif­fer­ent sizes. It turns out those cal­cula­t­ions de­pend only on the an­i­mal’s weight. A me­di­um-sized sau­ro­pod weighed over 20 tons. Us­ing avail­a­ble es­ti­mates of popula­t­ion dens­i­ties, the sci­en­tists cal­culated glob­al meth­ane emis­sions from sau­ro­pods to have been 520 mil­lion met­ric tons year­ly, com­pa­ra­ble to to­tal mod­ern meth­ane emis­sions.

Be­fore mod­ern in­dus­try took off, meth­ane emis­sions were roughly 200 mil­lion met­ric tons a year. Mod­ern ru­mi­nant an­i­mals, in­clud­ing cows, goats, gi­raffes, and oth­ers, pro­duce about one-fourth to one-half that amount. The stu­dy’s con­clu­sions not only show “just how strange and won­der­ful the work­ings of the plan­et are,” but al­so serve as a use­ful re­minder for the im­por­tance of mi­crobes and meth­ane for glob­al cli­mate, the re­search­ers wrote.

Scientists: birds are just baby dinosaurs, in a way


There’s a good rea­son birds are so much cut­er and less threat­en­ing than their scary an­ces­tors—the di­no­saurs—if new re­search is cor­rect.

It’s be­cause birds are, in a sense, di­no­saurs stuck in ba­by mode.

“When we look at birds, we are ac­tu­ally look­ing at ju­ve­nile di­no­saurs” to a great de­gree, said Arkhat Abzhanov of Har­vard Uni­vers­ity, co-au­thor of a re­port on the find­ings.

Skulls of three types of ar­chosaur—al­li­ga­tor, prim­i­tive di­no­saur, and ear­ly bird. The left col­umn rep­re­sents ju­ve­niles and the right col­umn rep­re­sents adults. (Im­age cour­te­sy U. of Tex­as at Aus­tin)


Abzhanov and col­leagues an­a­lyzed doz­ens of bird and di­no­saur skulls. They found that rath­er than take years to reach sex­u­al matur­ity, as many di­no­saurs did, birds sped up the clock­—some spe­cies take as lit­tle as 12 weeks to ma­ture—al­low­ing them to re­tain the phys­i­cal char­ac­ter­is­tics of ba­by di­no­saurs.

The report ap­peared May 27 in an on­line edi­tion of the jour­nal Na­ture.

In ev­o­lu­tion, spe­cies change be­cause some char­ac­ter­is­tics are more use­ful than oth­ers in a given envi­ron­ment. Thus in­di­vid­u­als with more of those traits thrive, and through their off­spring, spread those fea­tures through a popula­t­ion. In­di­vid­u­als lack­ing those traits grad­u­ally drop out. As this goes on, spe­cies can even­tu­ally be­come nearly un­rec­og­niz­a­ble com­pared to their old selves.

Most ev­o­lu­tion­ary re­search has fo­cused on the phys­i­cal struc­ture of or­gan­isms, but “what is in­ter­est­ing about this re­search,” Abzhanov said, is that it il­lus­trates how great changes can oc­cur “simply by chang­ing the rel­a­tive tim­ing of events in a crea­ture’s de­vel­op­ment.” Thus, he added, “na­ture has pro­duced the mod­ern bird—an en­tirely new crea­ture and one that, with ap­prox­i­mately 10,000 spe­cies, is to­day the most suc­cess­ful group of land ver­te­brates on the plan­et.”

Di­no­saurs have long snouts and mouths bristling with teeth, while birds have pro­por­tion­ally larg­er eyes and brains. But what in­spired the study was the real­iz­a­tion that skulls of mod­ern birds and ju­ve­nile di­no­saurs show sur­pris­ing si­m­i­lar­ity, re­search­ers said.

“No one had told the big sto­ry of the ev­o­lu­tion of the bird head be­fore,” said Bhart-Anjan Bhullar, a Har­vard doc­tor­al stu­dent and first au­thor of the stu­dy. “There had been a num­ber of smaller stud­ies that fo­cused on par­tic­u­lar points of the anat­o­my, but no one had looked at the en­tire pic­ture. ... When you do that, you see the ori­gins of the fea­tures that make the bird head spe­cial lie deep in the histo­ry of the ev­o­lu­tion of Ar­chosaurs, a group of an­i­mals that were the dom­i­nant, meat-eating an­i­mals for mil­lions of years.”

With col­leagues at The Uni­vers­ity of Tex­as at Aus­tin, the re­search­ers con­ducted CT scans on doz­ens of skulls, rang­ing from mod­ern birds to theropod­s—the di­no­saurs most closely re­lat­ed to birds—to early di­no­saur spe­cies. By mark­ing var­i­ous “land­marks” in the skull the scien­tists tracked how the over­all shape changed over mil­lions of years.

“We ex­am­ined skulls from the en­tire line­age that gave rise to mod­ern birds,” Abzhanov said. “We looked back ap­prox­i­mately 250 mil­lion years, to the Ar­chosaurs, the group which gave rise to crocodiles and al­li­ga­tors as well as mod­ern birds.” 

It turned out, he said, that while early di­no­saurs, even those closely re­lat­ed to mod­ern birds, un­dergo vast struc­tur­al changes as they ma­ture, the skulls of ju­ve­nile and adult birds re­main re­markably sim­i­lar. In the case of mod­ern birds, Abzhanov said, the change is the re­sult of a pro­cess known as pro­ge­n­e­sis, which causes an an­i­mal to reach sex­u­al matur­ity ear­li­er.

“To really study some­thing you have to look at its whole ex­ist­ence, and un­der­stand that one por­tion of its life can be parceled out and made in­to the en­tire life­span of a new, and in this case, radic­ally suc­cess­ful or­gan­is­m,” Bhullar said.

75% of African lion habitat gone, study says


Li­ons have lost three-quarters of their orig­i­nal nat­u­ral hab­i­tat in Af­ri­ca as peo­ple have tak­en it over for their own pur­poses, ac­cord­ing to a new stu­dy.

The re­port reaches a som­ber con­clu­sion: West­ern Af­ri­ca, in par­tic­u­lar, must be giv­en mon­ey to pro­tect li­ons. Billed as the fullest as­sess­ment to date on the state of Af­ri­can sa­van­nah, or grass­land, hab­i­tat, the re­port says the hab­i­tat loss has dev­as­tat­ed li­on popula­t­ions.

A li­on in West Af­ri­ca. (Cred­it: Phi­lipp Hen­schel/­Pan­the)


“From an orig­i­nal ar­ea a third larg­er than the con­ti­nen­tal Un­ited States, only 25 per­cent re­mains,” said Stu­art Pimm of Duke Uni­vers­ity in Dur­ham, N.C., co-author of the re­port, which ap­pears on­line this week in the jour­nal Bio­divers­ity and Con­serva­t­ion. Primm and oth­er sci­en­tists co­or­di­nated by the uni­vers­ity co-wrote the re­port with Phi­lipp Hen­schel, co­or­di­na­tor of the New York-based Pan­ther­a's Li­on Pro­gram Sur­vey.

The group used Google Earth's high-resolution sat­el­lite im­age­ry to ex­am­ined sa­van­nah across Af­ri­ca, which com­prises the ma­jor­ity of the li­on's cur­rent range. They al­so an­a­lyzed hu­man popula­t­ion dens­ity da­ta to iden­ti­fy ar­e­as of suit­a­ble hab­i­tat. They iden­ti­fied just 67 iso­lat­ed re­gions continent-wide where sig­nif­i­cant li­on popula­t­ions may per­sist. Of these, only 15 were es­ti­mat­ed to main­tain at least 500 li­ons.

The study al­so found that in West Af­ri­ca, where the spe­cies is clas­si­fied as Re­gion­ally En­dan­gered on the Red List of Threat­ened Spe­cies, few­er than 500 li­ons re­main, scat­tered across eight iso­lat­ed re­gions.

“Li­ons have been hit hard­est in West Af­ri­ca, where lo­cal go­vernments of­ten lack di­rect in­cen­tives to pro­tect them,” Hen­schel said. “While li­ons gen­er­ate billi­ons of tour­ist dol­lars across East­ern and South­ern Af­ri­ca, spur­ring go­vernments to in­vest in their pro­tection, wildlife-based tour­ism is only slowly de­vel­op­ing in West Af­ri­ca. Cur­rently li­ons still have lit­tle eco­nom­ic val­ue in the re­gion, and West Af­ri­can go­vernments will re­quire sig­nif­i­cant for­eign as­sis­tance in sta­bi­liz­ing re­maining popula­t­ions un­til sus­tain­a­ble lo­cal con­serva­t­ion ef­forts can be de­vel­ope­d.”

Pan­thera col­la­bo­rates in the Washington-based Na­t­ional Ge­o­graph­ic So­ci­ety's Big Cats In­i­ti­a­tive, which is meant to ad­dress the most se­ri­ous threats fac­ing big cats in the wild and help chan­nel fi­nan­cial sup­port to well-de­signed con­serva­t­ion pro­grams.

Pill may cut HIV risk as much as 99%


Daily use of a pill ap­proved to pro­tect against HIV in­fec­tion cuts a man’s risk of get­ting the vi­rus by 99 per­cent, a new study in­di­cates.

The re­search al­so of­fers the first ev­i­dence that even im­pe­r­fect ad­her­ence to the treat­ment reg­i­men can pro­vide a big re­duc­tion in the risk of ac­quir­ing the vi­rus, which causes AIDS. Par­ti­ci­pants in the re­search were found to be able to cut their HIV in­fec­tion risk by 76 pe­r­cent merely by tak­ing two doses a week.

The stu­dy, pub­lished in the Sept. 12 on­line is­sue of the re­search jour­nal Sci­ence Transla­t­ional Med­i­cine, ex­am­ines the ef­fec­tive­ness of a FDA-ap­proved drug known as teno­fovir diso­proxil fu­marate (brand name Tru­vada).

The re­search builds on a 2010 study by Rob­ert Grant at the Uni­vers­ity of Cal­i­for­nia, San Fran­cis­co and the Glad­stone In­sti­tute in San Fran­cis­co, along with col­leagues. The team found that Tru­vada—which had been used for years to treat HIV-positive pa­tients—could al­so pre­vent new in­fec­tions in peo­ple likely to come in con­tact with the vi­rus.

But ques­tions about the drug’s real-world ef­fec­tive­ness re­mained—in par­ticu­lar con­cern­ing the is­sue of ad­her­ence to a reg­i­men of a pill a day. “There was con­cern that the pro­tective ef­fect of Tru­vada was frag­ile, and that in­di­vid­u­als tak­ing the drug would need to ad­here pe­r­fectly to daily reg­i­men for it to work,” said Grant. “This new study sug­gests that Tru­vada can help block the vi­rus even if the pe­r­son on a daily reg­i­men does­n’t al­ways ad­here pe­r­fectly.”

The study ex­am­ined the risk of HIV ac­qui­si­tion in men who have sex with men. Par­ti­ci­pants dif­fer­ent doses of the drug. Men came in­to a clin­ic eve­ry day and were giv­en ei­ther two pills per week, four pills per week or se­ven pills per week. The re­search­ers then com­pared drug con­centra­t­ions from their study to drug con­centra­t­ions from a pre­vi­ous stu­dy.

The re­search team es­ti­mates that par­ti­ci­pants could re­duce their risk of HIV by 76 pe­r­cent tak­ing two doses per week, 96 pe­r­cent by tak­ing four doses per week, and 99 pe­r­cent by tak­ing se­ven doses per week.

The tim­ing of the dos­ing rel­a­tive to sex­u­al in­ter­course likely mat­ters, based on re­search done in non-human pri­ma­tes, al­though this could not be in­ves­t­i­gated in de­tail in peo­ple, the re­search­ers added. High­er drug con­centra­t­ions and more fre­quent use may be re­quired for wom­en be­cause the drugs are not con­centrated as much in the fe­male gen­i­tal tract, the au­thors not­ed.

“Pa­tients should still take one pill a day to achieve the best re­sults, and we en­cour­age peo­ple to ex­plore mul­ti­ple meth­ods to pre­vent HIV—such as reg­u­lar con­dom use, early treat­ment of HIV in­fec­tion in part­ners, good com­mu­nica­t­ion and male cir­cum­ci­sion,” Grant said. “We hope that our find­ings lead to more ef­fective use of pre­vention tools that fi­nally squash the HIV/AIDS epi­dem­ic.”

Gene that may have helped make people smart ID’d


Re­search­ers have found a gene that they say helps ex­plain how hu­mans evolved from apes.

Called miR-941, it seems to have played a cru­cial role in brain de­vel­op­ment and may shed light on how we learn­ed to use tools and lan­guage, the sci­en­tists say. They add that it's the first time a new gene, car­ried only by peo­ple and not by apes, has been shown to have a spe­cif­ic func­tion in the body.

“This new mol­e­cule sprang from no­where at a time when our spe­cies was un­der­go­ing dra­mat­ic changes: liv­ing long­er, walk­ing up­right, learn­ing how to use tools and how to com­mu­ni­cate,” said Mar­tin Tay­lor of the Uni­vers­ity of Ed­in­burgh in Scot­land, who led the stu­dy. “We're now hope­ful that we will find more new genes that help show what makes us hu­man.”

The gene has been found to be highly ac­tive in two ar­eas of the brain that con­trol our de­ci­sion mak­ing and lan­guage abil­i­ties. The study sug­gests it could have a role in the ad­vanced brain func­tions that make us hu­man.

A team at the uni­vers­ity com­pared the hu­man ge­nome to 11 oth­er spe­cies of mam­mals, in­clud­ing chim­panzees, go­ril­las, mouse and rat, to find the dif­fer­ences be­tween them. The re­sults, pub­lished in the jour­nal Na­ture Commu­nica­t­ions, in­di­cate the gene is un­ique to hu­mans. The re­search­ers say it emerged be­tween six and one mil­lion years ago, af­ter the hu­man line­age had branched off from apes.
Most dif­fer­ences be­tween spe­cies oc­cur as a re­sult of changes to ex­ist­ing genes, or the du­plica­t­ion and de­le­tion of genes. But sci­en­tists say this gene emerged fully func­tional out of non-coding ge­net­ic ma­te­ri­al, pre­vi­ously termed “junk DNA,” in a startlingly short time in evo­lu­tion­ary terms.

http://wrd.cm/1gVYv0C


Stunning photos show the solar flare explosions that happened all weekend long on the sun. (Image: NASA/SDO)

“Cloud map” of planet beyond our system a first

As­tro­no­mers us­ing da­ta from NASA’s Kep­ler and Spitzer space tele­scopes have cre­at­ed what they call the first cloud map of a plan­et be­yond our so­lar sys­tem. It’s a siz­zling, Ju­pi­ter-like world known as Kep­ler-7b.

High clouds in the west and clear skies in the east mark the plan­et, the map in­di­cates. Pre­vi­ous stud­ies from Spitzer have re­sulted in tem­per­a­ture maps of plan­ets or­bit­ing oth­er stars, but this is the first look at cloud struc­tures on a dis­tant world.
This diagram represents the cloud map of Kepler 7b, left, with Jupiter shown alongside for size comparison. (Image credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/MIT)


“By ob­serv­ing this plan­et with Spit­zer and Kep­ler for more than three years, we were able to pro­duce a very low-re­so­lu­tion ‘map’ of this gi­ant, gas­e­ous plan­et,” said Brice-Oli­vier De­mory of Mas­sa­chu­setts In­sti­tute of Tech­nol­o­gy in Cam­bridge.

He is the lead au­thor of a pa­per on the work, ac­cept­ed for pub­lica­t­ion in the jour­nal As­t­ro­phys­i­cal Jour­nal Let­ters.

“We would­n’t ex­pect to see oceans or con­ti­nents on this type of world, but we de­tected a clear, re­flec­tive sig­na­ture that we in­ter­preted as clouds.”

Kep­ler has dis­cov­ered more than 150 exoplan­ets, which are plan­ets out­side our so­lar sys­tem. Kep­ler-7b, about 50 per­cent wid­er than Ju­pi­ter, was one of the first. The tel­e­scope is out of com­mis­sion for plan­et-hunting, but as­tro­no­mers are still por­ing over al­most four years’ worth of old da­ta.

Kep­ler’s visible-light ob­serva­t­ions of Kep­ler-7b’s moon-like phases led to a rough map of the plan­et that showed a bright spot on its west­ern hem­i­sphere. But these da­ta alone weren’t enough to de­ci­pher wheth­er the bright spot was com­ing from clouds or heat, ac­cord­ing to the as­tro­no­mers. The Spitzer tel­e­scope helped an­swer that.

Like Kep­ler, Spitzer can fix its gaze at a star sys­tem as a plan­et or­bits around the star, gath­er­ing clues about the plan­et’s at­mos­phere. Spitzer’s abil­ity to de­tect in­fra­red light, a low-energy form of light in­vis­i­ble to the un­aided eye, means it was able to meas­ure Kep­ler-7b’s tem­per­a­ture, es­ti­mat­ing it to be be­tween 1,500 and 1,800 de­grees Fahr­en­heit (1,100 and 1,300 Kelv­in).

This is rel­a­tively cool for a plan­et that or­bits so close to its star – less than 1/15 as close to its sun as we are to ours – and ac­cord­ing to as­tro­no­mers, too cool to be the source of light Kep­ler ob­served. In­stead, they de­ter­mined, light from the plan­et’s star is bounc­ing off cloud tops on the plan­et’s west side.

“Kep­ler-7b re­flects much more light than most gi­ant plan­ets we’ve found, which we at­trib­ute to clouds in the up­per at­mos­phere,” said Thom­as Barc­lay, Kep­ler sci­ent­ist at NASA’s Ames Re­search Cen­ter in Mof­fett Field, Ca­lif. “Un­like those on Earth, the cloud pat­terns on this plan­et do not seem to change much over time—it has a re­markably sta­ble cli­mate.”

The find­ings are seen as an early step to­ward us­ing si­m­i­lar tech­niques to study the at­mos­pheres of plan­ets more like Earth in make­up and size.

“Cloud map” of planet beyond our system a first

As­tro­no­mers us­ing da­ta from NASA’s Kep­ler and Spitzer space tele­scopes have cre­at­ed what they call the first cloud map of a plan­et be­yond our so­lar sys­tem. It’s a siz­zling, Ju­pi­ter-like world known as Kep­ler-7b.

High clouds in the west and clear skies in the east mark the plan­et, the map in­di­cates. Pre­vi­ous stud­ies from Spitzer have re­sulted in tem­per­a­ture maps of plan­ets or­bit­ing oth­er stars, but this is the first look at cloud struc­tures on a dis­tant world.
This diagram represents the cloud map of Kepler 7b, left, with Jupiter shown alongside for size comparison. (Image credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/MIT)


“By ob­serv­ing this plan­et with Spit­zer and Kep­ler for more than three years, we were able to pro­duce a very low-re­so­lu­tion ‘map’ of this gi­ant, gas­e­ous plan­et,” said Brice-Oli­vier De­mory of Mas­sa­chu­setts In­sti­tute of Tech­nol­o­gy in Cam­bridge.

He is the lead au­thor of a pa­per on the work, ac­cept­ed for pub­lica­t­ion in the jour­nal As­t­ro­phys­i­cal Jour­nal Let­ters.

“We would­n’t ex­pect to see oceans or con­ti­nents on this type of world, but we de­tected a clear, re­flec­tive sig­na­ture that we in­ter­preted as clouds.”

Kep­ler has dis­cov­ered more than 150 exoplan­ets, which are plan­ets out­side our so­lar sys­tem. Kep­ler-7b, about 50 per­cent wid­er than Ju­pi­ter, was one of the first. The tel­e­scope is out of com­mis­sion for plan­et-hunting, but as­tro­no­mers are still por­ing over al­most four years’ worth of old da­ta.

Kep­ler’s visible-light ob­serva­t­ions of Kep­ler-7b’s moon-like phases led to a rough map of the plan­et that showed a bright spot on its west­ern hem­i­sphere. But these da­ta alone weren’t enough to de­ci­pher wheth­er the bright spot was com­ing from clouds or heat, ac­cord­ing to the as­tro­no­mers. The Spitzer tel­e­scope helped an­swer that.

Like Kep­ler, Spitzer can fix its gaze at a star sys­tem as a plan­et or­bits around the star, gath­er­ing clues about the plan­et’s at­mos­phere. Spitzer’s abil­ity to de­tect in­fra­red light, a low-energy form of light in­vis­i­ble to the un­aided eye, means it was able to meas­ure Kep­ler-7b’s tem­per­a­ture, es­ti­mat­ing it to be be­tween 1,500 and 1,800 de­grees Fahr­en­heit (1,100 and 1,300 Kelv­in).

This is rel­a­tively cool for a plan­et that or­bits so close to its star – less than 1/15 as close to its sun as we are to ours – and ac­cord­ing to as­tro­no­mers, too cool to be the source of light Kep­ler ob­served. In­stead, they de­ter­mined, light from the plan­et’s star is bounc­ing off cloud tops on the plan­et’s west side.

“Kep­ler-7b re­flects much more light than most gi­ant plan­ets we’ve found, which we at­trib­ute to clouds in the up­per at­mos­phere,” said Thom­as Barc­lay, Kep­ler sci­ent­ist at NASA’s Ames Re­search Cen­ter in Mof­fett Field, Ca­lif. “Un­like those on Earth, the cloud pat­terns on this plan­et do not seem to change much over time—it has a re­markably sta­ble cli­mate.”

The find­ings are seen as an early step to­ward us­ing si­m­i­lar tech­niques to study the at­mos­pheres of plan­ets more like Earth in make­up and size.

“Cloud map” of planet beyond our system a first

As­tro­no­mers us­ing da­ta from NASA’s Kep­ler and Spitzer space tele­scopes have cre­at­ed what they call the first cloud map of a plan­et be­yond our so­lar sys­tem. It’s a siz­zling, Ju­pi­ter-like world known as Kep­ler-7b.

High clouds in the west and clear skies in the east mark the plan­et, the map in­di­cates. Pre­vi­ous stud­ies from Spitzer have re­sulted in tem­per­a­ture maps of plan­ets or­bit­ing oth­er stars, but this is the first look at cloud struc­tures on a dis­tant world.
This diagram represents the cloud map of Kepler 7b, left, with Jupiter shown alongside for size comparison. (Image credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/MIT)


“By ob­serv­ing this plan­et with Spit­zer and Kep­ler for more than three years, we were able to pro­duce a very low-re­so­lu­tion ‘map’ of this gi­ant, gas­e­ous plan­et,” said Brice-Oli­vier De­mory of Mas­sa­chu­setts In­sti­tute of Tech­nol­o­gy in Cam­bridge.

He is the lead au­thor of a pa­per on the work, ac­cept­ed for pub­lica­t­ion in the jour­nal As­t­ro­phys­i­cal Jour­nal Let­ters.

“We would­n’t ex­pect to see oceans or con­ti­nents on this type of world, but we de­tected a clear, re­flec­tive sig­na­ture that we in­ter­preted as clouds.”

Kep­ler has dis­cov­ered more than 150 exoplan­ets, which are plan­ets out­side our so­lar sys­tem. Kep­ler-7b, about 50 per­cent wid­er than Ju­pi­ter, was one of the first. The tel­e­scope is out of com­mis­sion for plan­et-hunting, but as­tro­no­mers are still por­ing over al­most four years’ worth of old da­ta.

Kep­ler’s visible-light ob­serva­t­ions of Kep­ler-7b’s moon-like phases led to a rough map of the plan­et that showed a bright spot on its west­ern hem­i­sphere. But these da­ta alone weren’t enough to de­ci­pher wheth­er the bright spot was com­ing from clouds or heat, ac­cord­ing to the as­tro­no­mers. The Spitzer tel­e­scope helped an­swer that.

Like Kep­ler, Spitzer can fix its gaze at a star sys­tem as a plan­et or­bits around the star, gath­er­ing clues about the plan­et’s at­mos­phere. Spitzer’s abil­ity to de­tect in­fra­red light, a low-energy form of light in­vis­i­ble to the un­aided eye, means it was able to meas­ure Kep­ler-7b’s tem­per­a­ture, es­ti­mat­ing it to be be­tween 1,500 and 1,800 de­grees Fahr­en­heit (1,100 and 1,300 Kelv­in).

This is rel­a­tively cool for a plan­et that or­bits so close to its star – less than 1/15 as close to its sun as we are to ours – and ac­cord­ing to as­tro­no­mers, too cool to be the source of light Kep­ler ob­served. In­stead, they de­ter­mined, light from the plan­et’s star is bounc­ing off cloud tops on the plan­et’s west side.

“Kep­ler-7b re­flects much more light than most gi­ant plan­ets we’ve found, which we at­trib­ute to clouds in the up­per at­mos­phere,” said Thom­as Barc­lay, Kep­ler sci­ent­ist at NASA’s Ames Re­search Cen­ter in Mof­fett Field, Ca­lif. “Un­like those on Earth, the cloud pat­terns on this plan­et do not seem to change much over time—it has a re­markably sta­ble cli­mate.”

The find­ings are seen as an early step to­ward us­ing si­m­i­lar tech­niques to study the at­mos­pheres of plan­ets more like Earth in make­up and size.

“Maternal instincts” seen in group of colorful beetles

A group of re­lat­ed, col­or­ful bee­tles in the thick fo­li­age of trop­i­cal forests shows signs of ma­ter­nal in­stincts and act­ive care, sci­en­tists say.

In a re­port, re­search­ers de­scribed “ma­ter­nal” be­hav­iors in eight spe­cies with­in a sub­family of leaf bee­tles known as broad-shouldered leaf bee­tles, or Chry­so­meli­nae. The find­ings were pub­lished in a spe­cial is­sue of the re­search jour­nal Zookeys.
Larvae of the spe­cies Dory­phora pay­kullimove am­ong leaves, fol­lowed by their mot­her, in Pa­na­ma. (Credit: S. Van Bael)

Moth­ers “ac­tively de­fend off­spring” as well as the eggs, wrote the re­search­ers, Don­ald M. Wind­sor of the Smith­so­nian Trop­i­cal Re­search In­sti­tute in Balboa-Ancon, Pan­a­ma, and col­leagues.

Maternal care in in­sects is rarely seen in such act­ive forms, though com­mon in lower-level forms such as in­sects posi­tioning their eggs so the new­borns will have ac­cess to a good food source.

Bee­tle moth­ers in two spe­cies within the Chry­so­meli­nae group treated the leaf on which their young­sters were born as a sort of nest to be pro­tected, the sci­en­tists found. The moth­ers re­acted ag­gres­sively to in­vaders, and charged to­ward the edge the leaf when a per­son put a thin stick in the ar­ea, they wrote. Stamp­ing and leaf-shak­ing were other com­mon re­act­ions, they added.

A cam­era held 10 cm (4 inches) un­der and to the side of the “na­tal leaf” got the strong­est re­ac­tion, according to the scien­tists. Moth­ers also were found to “guard” lar­vae by strad­dling them.

Oth­er spe­cies of bee­tles showed “less ag­gres­sive” forms of ma­ter­nal care, they added. The sci­en­tists said some moth­ers seem to make changes to the leaves where their off­spring are born. And once the young bee­tles, or lar­vae, are born, some moth­ers were de­scribed as “herd­ing” them to make them go in de­sired di­rec­tions and keep them to­geth­er in lit­tle groups.

The in­ves­ti­ga­tors said it’s not clear why these be­hav­iors evolved in these Cen­tral and South Amer­i­can bee­tles. “Large voids re­main in our un­der­stand­ing of the nat­u­ral his­to­ry of both groups, in­clud­ing the ident­ity and im­por­tance of preda­tors and par­a­sitoids and the di­verse ways in which moth­ers may be in­flu­enc­ing the sur­viv­al of off­spring,” Wind­sor and col­leagues wrote.

Already-approved drug tied to longer, healthy life in mice

The first drug to suc­cess­fully ex­tend the life­span of nor­mal lab mice al­so does so in a way that pro­longs their healthy ex­ist­ence, ac­cord­ing to a new stu­dy.

Re­search­ers hope the drug, ra­pa­my­cin, may al­so serve to pro­long life and ward off aging-related dis­eases in people, especially as it’s al­ready tested and ap­proved for an­other hu­man use: to pre­vent trans­plant re­jec­tion.
A pop­u­lar strain of lab mice known as C57BL/6, used in the new study by Yi­qiang Zhang and col­leagues at the Uni­ver­si­ty of Tex­as Health Sci­ence Cen­ter at San An­to­nio. (Im­age cour­te­sy FDA)

But obstacles remain before any hu­man use of ra­pa­my­cin as a longevity boost­er. It’s un­clear what dosages and reg­i­mens might be required for such a pur­pose. Con­cerns about side ef­fects linger. And mouse stud­ies have used a spe­cial encap­sula­tion method that’s not cur­rent­ly used in human con­sump­tion of the drug.

A biotech firm has sprung up in San An­to­nio, Tex­as in hopes of ex­ploit­ing new com­mer­cial pos­si­bil­i­ties for ra­pa­my­cin, and its of­fi­cials have said that clin­i­cal tri­als are ex­pected soon.

In the new stu­dy, mice were fed ra­pa­my­cin as part of their di­et start­ing when they were 19 months—the equiv­a­lent of about 60 hu­man years—old. The meas­ured life­span in­creases were more mod­est than in some pre­vi­ous stud­ies. Com­pared to un­treated mice, the life­span of the treated ro­dents went up by about 3 per­cent on av­er­age, al­though the dif­fer­ence rose to 7 per­cent for mice who made it to old­er ages to beg­in with.

Pre­vi­ous stud­ies had yielded more dra­mat­ic re­sults.

A study in the July 2009 is­sue of Na­ture, us­ing a si­m­i­lar meth­od­ol­o­gy but dif­fer­ent mouse strains, had found in­creases as high as about 10.5 per­cent for old­er mice on ra­pa­my­cin com­pared to un­treated. An­oth­er piece of re­search found that if treat­ment was started when the mice were about half as old, then the av­er­age sur­viv­al in­crease jumped to about 14 per­cent. That study ap­peared in the Feb­ru­ary 2011 is­sue of The Jour­nals of Ger­on­tol­o­gy: Bi­o­log­i­cal Sci­ences.The new stu­dy, in the May 16 on­line edi­tion of the same jour­nal, fo­cused on the health ef­fects in ad­di­tion to the life­span ef­fects. “Whether the life-ex­tending ef­fects of ra­pa­my­cin treat­ment are re­flected in ex­tended health has not yet been ex­ten­sively in­ves­ti­gat­ed,” wrote the au­thors, re­search­ers with the Uni­vers­ity of Tex­as Health Sci­ence Cen­ter at San An­to­nio.

The au­thors in­clud­ed scientists who have li­censed ra­pa­my­cin-related tech­nolo­gies to the biotech company, Ra­pa­my­cin Hold­ings Inc.

They al­so wrote that they in­ves­t­i­gated the health ef­fects in great­er de­tail be­cause “in­creas­ing life span with­out sim­ul­ta­ne­ously in­creas­ing health span is a fool’s er­rand.” They found that treat­ed mice enjoyed health ben­e­fits in­clud­ing in­creased stride length and bet­ter re­sults on a test of en­dur­ance.

Rapamycin’s lifespan bene­fits to mice have tended to be greater for fe­males, which received life­span boosts up to 80 per­cent greater than the males depending on the stu­dy.

The in­ves­ti­ga­tors in the new study used ra­pa­my­cin that had been “mi­cro­en­cap­su­lated” by a spe­cial meth­od in or­der to re­sist de­grada­t­ion when mixed with the ro­dent chow. This is­n’t the same way ra­pa­my­cin, a pre­scrip­tion drug, is nor­mally tak­en in hu­man clin­i­cal use, al­though it is tak­en oral­ly.

Ra­pamycin is thought to ex­ert its ef­fects on life­span by sup­pressing the ac­ti­vity of a chem­i­cal path­way in the body known as mTOR, which helps to gov­ern growth and sur­viv­al re­sponses in cells.

Ra­pamycin al­so helps pre­vent trans­plant re­jec­tion by blocking cer­tain im­mune sys­tem cells, lead­ing to con­cerns of harm­ful im­mune-sup­pressing side ef­fects. But these have not proved prob­le­matic in the mouse stud­ies, ac­cord­ing to scien­tists.

Very few sub­stances have been found to re­liably pro­long life­span in lab an­i­mals. Be­fore ra­pamycin, the one con­sid­ered per­haps most prom­is­ing was res­ver­a­trol, found to ex­tend life­span in round­worms, yeast and cer­tain fish. But such ben­e­fits in lab mice, seen as an im­por­tant stepping-stone to­ward hu­man stud­ies, were re­ported only for mice that were obese.
Ra­pamycin is so named be­cause it was dis­cov­ered com­ing from soil bac­te­ria at East­er Is­land, al­so known as Rapa Nui.

galaxies


Space photo weekend edition: Crashing galaxies in Pandora's cluster reveal the location of dark matter.

http://wrd.cm/1gSGNLJ

dimanche 27 octobre 2013

Lioness Hunts Zebra

Untamed and Uncut- Zebra Escapes Lion's Jaws

japan


japan


rio di janiro


colorado


norway


portugal


in tayland


lozern suis



ttttoooookkkkyyyyoooooo


?????????agadiror paris


??????????



new york city



Space photo weekend edition: New photos reveal the amazing lakes at Titan's north pole.

http://wrd.cm/17QaKCz

samedi 26 octobre 2013



We want to bring the attention of any of you who enjoy puzzle games to one called Phylo, developed by Prof. Jérôme Waldispühl and his colleagues from McGill University. (Link to game: http://bit.ly/1bivTHG)

Described as “a cross between Tetris, Rubik’s cube and an old-fashioned sliding-tile puzzle game”, where the goal is to line up coloured rectangles, gamers are actually helping pinpoint genetic anomalies that researchers believe may play a role in a range of diseases including diabetes, breast cancer and retinoblastoma. Since it was first launched, players ranging from teenagers to seniors have suggested solutions for over 4,000 puzzles based on genomic data.

So if you like puzzle games, consider giving it a try!

You can read the rest of the press release here: http://bit.ly/1ig6fpM



In the transcriptional races, the larger RNA polymerase I has always seemed to work faster than the more easily studied RNA polymerase II – and now scientists have an idea of why!
(Though keep in mind that all three eukaryotic RNA polymerases do play different roles in a cell, so it’s not a question of which is ‘better’)

Having been able to determine the 3-dimensional structure of RNA polymerase I, they realized that the larger size is in part because the polymerase already incorporates many of the ‘extra’ helper proteins that RNA polymerase II needs to bind to in order to do its job. They also discovered that, what in RNA polymerase II are two separate modules, has in RNA polymerase I been combined into a single multi-tasking component.

Though these changes result in RNA polymerase I being able to produce RNA more quickly, it also makes it harder to regulate the process. One structural mechanism they discovered for doing so is a built-in loop that can block the space DNA would normally dock onto.

You can read more here: http://bit.ly/1g0obrx

Image: The cell’s Swiss-army knife: the structure of RNA polymerase I revealed an efficiency-boosting strategy. Credit: EMBL/C. Férnandez-Tornero & P. Riedinger
Mutator S is one of the first proteins on the scene when mismatched nucleotides make an appearance. And thanks to a new technique that involves hybrid nanomaterials and small angle X-ray scattering technology, researchers have for the first time been able to ‘observe’ the work being done by MutS, helping to validate the “beads-on-a-string” model of DNA repair.

You can read more about it here: http://bit.ly/1aJQwel

Image: DNA_Repair. redondoself/Flickr

Adivina adivinador: ¿Qué animal se camufla en el bosque, tiene un cuerno flexible sobre su hocico y reapareció recientemente en Ecuador, 50 años después de haber sido declarado extinto? ¿No se te ocurre? Se trata del curioso lagarto Pinocho: http://bit.ly/GZjq24